Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Applied Gerontology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Fortinsky, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Variations in Outcomes of Care in Urban and Rural Nursing Facilities in Maine

Andrew F. Coburn

University of Southern Maine

Julie T. Fralich

University of Southern Maine

Catherine McGuire

University of Southern Maine

Richard H. Fortinsky

Case Western Reserve University

Federal and state regulators and the nursing home industry have accelerated efforts to improve care practices in response to the Institute of Medicine's 1986 report on the quality of nursing home care and the federal Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 (OBRA 1987). Very little is known about the quality of care in rural nursing facilities compared to their urban counterparts. This study describes variations in facility and resident characteristics of urban and rural nursing facilities in Maine and examines differences in outcomes of care. The study estimates rural-urban differences in 11 quality indicators (measured at the facility level) controlling for resident, facility, and market characteristics and other factors that may affect quality. Results reveal few significant differences between rural and urban nursing facilities. Further research is needed to understand whether differences in the characteristics of rural and urban facilities not measured in this study may affect nursing facility quality.

Journal of Applied Gerontology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 202-223 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/073346489601500205
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The GerontologistHome page
D. E. Yeatts and C. M. Cready
Consequences of Empowered CNA Teams in Nursing Home Settings: A Longitudinal Assessment
Gerontologist, June 1, 2007; 47(3): 323 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The GerontologistHome page
J. A. Lucas, T. Avi-Itzhak, J. P. Robinson, C. G. Morris, M. J. Koren, and S. C. Reinhard
Continuous Quality Improvement as an Innovation: Which Nursing Facilities Adopt It?
Gerontologist, February 1, 2005; 45(1): 68 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Aging HealthHome page
W. D. Spector and R. H. Fortinsky
Pressure Ulcer Prevalence in Ohio Nursing Homes: Clinical and Facility Correlates
J Aging Health, February 1, 1998; 10(1): 62 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]