Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Applied Gerontology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roush, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Teasdale, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reduced Hospitalization Rates of Two Sets of Community-Residing Older Adults After Use of a Personal Response System

Robert E. Roush

Baylor College of Medicine

Thomas A. Teasdale

Baylor College of Medicine

This study replicated, in a United States setting, an earlier study conducted in Canada to determine whether use of a 24-hour personal response system (PRS) affected selected hospital utilization rates among community-residing users. Utilization rates of 106 Canadian patients were reviewed for 1 year before and 1 year after enrollment in the PRS: These were compared with a similar set of 101 U.S. patients using the same PRS program. Self-paired analyses were conducted on number of emergency department (ED) visits and number of inpatient days. During the 1-year follow-up periods, both sets of subscribers using the Lifeline system experienced a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.05) in per person inpatient days (mean reduction = 6.5 days). No significant differences occurred in ED visits. When indicated, a PRS may be an appropriate environmental prescription.

Journal of Applied Gerontology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 355-366 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/073346489701600309
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Aging HealthHome page
E. Marziali, J. M. D. Serafini, and L. McCleary
A Systematic Review of Practice Standards and Research Ethics in Technology-Based Home Health Care Intervention Programs for Older Adults
J Aging Health, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 679 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]