Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Applied Gerontology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Angus, J.
Right arrow Articles by Reeve, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ageism: A Threat to "Aging Well" in the 21st Century

Jocelyn Angus

Victoria University

Patricia Reeve

Council on the Ageing (COTA) Vic

At the beginning of the 21st century, the new mantra—"successful" and "resourceful" aging—is used interchangeably and intoned often unreflectively by a society eager to find ways to reduce aged-related losses. Yet despite numerous empirical studies and public health promotion strategies directed at ways of aging well, negative images of aging have an enduring vitality. This article examine sageism in a range of political, social, and cultural manifestos that have a productive role in encoding tacit assumptions and stereotypes about older people’s lives. Particular attention is given to the pervasive use of the concept of "dependency," a stereotypic and productive ageist mechanism that continues to infiltrate what are arguably more inclusive strategies directed toward a global model of aging well. The authors explore some potential strategies to combat stereotypes and warn that aging well initiatives based on individualism and "self-responsibility" risk reproducing existing power relations that continue to inform ageist stereotypes.

Key Words: ageism • aging • successful aging • dependency • stereotypes

Journal of Applied Gerontology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 137-152 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0733464805285745
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
L. Ziden, C.-G. Wenestam, and M. Hansson-Scherman
A life-breaking event: early experiences of the consequences of a hip fracture for elderly people
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 801 - 811.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
J. Warburton, J. Paynter, and A. Petriwskyj
Volunteering as a Productive Aging Activity: Incentives and Barriers to Volunteering by Australian Seniors
Journal of Applied Gerontology, August 1, 2007; 26(4): 333 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]