Journal of Applied Gerontology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0733464807311655v1
27/3/267    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shatenstein, B.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on April 14, 2008, doi:10.1177/0733464807311655

Journal of Applied Gerontology 2008;27:267.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


Article

Issues in Recruitment, Retention, and Data Collection in a Longitudinal Nutrition Study of Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Early-Stage Alzheimer's Dementia

Bryna Shatenstein*, Marie-Jeanne Kergoat, and Isabelle Reid

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bryna.shatenstein{at}umontreal.ca.


   Abstract
The Nutrition-Memory Study (NMS) followed evolution of nutrition status among elderly community-dwelling individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Participants, age-matched to cognitively intact controls, were recruited from three university hospital memory clinics. Incentives encouraged retention; flexible procedures and caregiver collaboration permitted collection of nutrition information from AD patients. Of 71 patients referred by the clinics, 55 (77.5%) were eligible, 42 (76.4% of eligible) were recruited with their caregivers, and 40 (72.7%) completed the baseline. Thirty-two patient–caregiver dyads completed the first three interviews (58.1% of eligible; 80% of recruited); 26 of the 32 dyads (81.3% of recruited) completed four of the five interviews, and 14 (43.8% of recruited) were seen at all five study visits. Ensuring successful recruitment and retention in this clientele requires strong links between the research team and target community, ensuring relevance of the study to participants, and being mindful of the burden levied on patient–caregiver dyads.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?